Matrimony deals manage usually indicate the timeframe for the and this amarriage need to have taken place

Matrimony deals manage usually indicate the timeframe for the and this amarriage need to have taken place

1. Yet ,, within the family history, each of us knowthat per signal you will find an exclusion. A good vexing point ofgenealogy would be the fact no one very understands exactly how to use the newest exclusions orrules with one definitive adjective including constantly, possibly, probably,probably, etc. It might be interesting in the event the here most other instances ofjointures getting produced per year or a few immediately following a well-known matrimony go out.

2. Can there be a keen extant dispensation with the matrimony out-of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, once taken off this new fifth LordClifford? Who would narrow down its relationships time.

Arthur

Allegedly, when the good dispensation are looked for and you can granted, it can havebeen by one of the following the, that will can be found in the fresh new correspondingregister publication, when it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop regarding Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If for example the 10th Lord Clifford do wed at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas E afterwards where seasons, really does brand new chronology perhaps not functions?

John fingers?

Elizabeth created within the late 1487, Henry born into the 1488/nine, Joan when you look at the ,etc. filling out the new labels of the posting out-of . If (a) thechronology nonetheless work; and you can (b) their own relationships part wasn’t Pogledajte ovu stranicu reasonable; thenwe just have the new 1505 pedigree off Henry VII’s which is for the oppositionto brand new supposition one she are a valid child.

6. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Will be Clifford daughters the new onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Have there been someone else? If that’s the case,would not one to echo defectively on this file once the a resource?

Away from comparisons I’ve made from the latest c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which are

Regarding the c.1505 Relations pedigrees, new Clifford children are perhaps not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but instead regarding St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot regularly the fresh St. John loved ones, pursuing the is the recommendations asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, once the obtained from new 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. article. Brand new phrasing when you look at the quotations is exactly because looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Away from my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got about three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Lady the King’s Mom.” who had “The new Queen.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got 3 daus & 2 sons:

An excellent. “Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Rod regarding Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded towards Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke out of Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[yet another youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four youngsters:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you can sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however called.C2. “Age, wedded so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “E, married very first into the Lord Zouche; immediately following on LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated although not titled.

Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”