Good. 8-2-181 turned effective towards the , while Taylor Bean produced the borrowed funds when you look at the
Because the time of one’s mortgage ‘s the vital go out within the determining if Appellee-claim is actually covered by 1322(b)(2), come across Jackson, 2005 WL 1563529 , at *cuatro, the newest Legal discovers you to definitely O
In addition, when you look at the deciding whether Appellants’ cellular residence is actual or individual assets, the fresh new Court need move to relevant county legislation, which in this situation is Georgia legislation. Select Burner v. All of us, 440 You.S. 48 , 5.5, 99 S.Ct. 914 , 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979) (“Possessions interests are built and laid out by county legislation”) come across as well as Kennedy v. Lane Dinners, Inc. (When you look at the lso are Kennedy), 192 B.Roentgen. 282 , 287 (Bankr. Yards.D.Ga 1996).
Appellants compete one O.C.G.A good. 8-2-181. which had been introduced from the Georgia Legislature from inside the 2003, overrules When you look at the lso are Arizona.